Managing Security Requirements Conflicts †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Managing Security Requirements Conflicts. Answer: Introduction: The organizational improvement and excellence is not given priority by the managers whereas, MIS VP Ms. Wyatt is the only one seemed to be concerned. The institution is primitive and thus, follows the traditional approach. New changes have negative critic in the organization and nave employees and managers are very much reluctant to stick to the conventional form management. Clients are not prepared for change as well as unprepared and unfamiliar with the system (Davis et al. 2014). MIS need new approach to organizational goals and values by adding new forms and limitations. Staffs, lower in the hierarchy were excluded from preparation and decision for MIS. Chain of command is not effective; Ms. Wyatt was prohibited to bring changes to the system as well as informing the president (Paja, Dalpiaz and Giorgini 2013). Lack of will and motivation among the managers is hampering the production of the organization. Keep the staffs away from decision-making, resulting into lack of commitment and trust. The senior vice presidents of each department have been with the bank for many years and thus, reflect a stable and conservative outlook. Senior males of the organization neglected, opinion of a woman. Managers are not willing to bring the problem in the limelight; not they are assertive about changing the system to fulfill organizational benefit (Dalpiaz, Giorgini and Mylopoulos 2013). It has been understood in the report that 93 percent information was complex and irrelevant, 76 percent of the case imprints of the printouts were hard to interpret. Trust in MIS was a big concern, as 87 percent of the employees do not trust and fully support MIS. Lack of conviction from the managers end and tried to hide the situation from the senior by keeping them in the shadow. Reference Dalpiaz, F., Giorgini, P. and Mylopoulos, J., 2013. Adaptive socio-technical systems management: a requirements-based approach.Requirements engineering,18(1), pp.1-24. Davis, M.C., Challenger, R., Jayewardene, D.N. and Clegg, C.W., 2014. Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: A call for bravery.Applied ergonomics,45(2), pp.171-180. Paja, E., Dalpiaz, F. and Giorgini, P., 2013, November. Managing security requirements conflicts in socio-technical systems management. InInternational Conference on Conceptual Modeling(pp. 270-283). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Waddell, D., Creed, A., Cummings, T.G. and Worley, C., 2013.Organisational change: Development and transformation. Cengage Learning.